Ep. 23: Golden-Eyed Lightning Rod

00:00:01
Speaker 1: In the first half of the twentieth century, America came very close to destroying its wolves, which were saved by the insights of a new science that changed the country’s understanding of predators. I’m Dan Flores and this is the American West, brought to you by Velvet Buck Wine, where the hunt.

00:00:21
Speaker 2: Meets the harvest.

00:00:23
Speaker 1: A portion of each bottle goes to support backcountry hunters and anglers. Limited supply available at Velvetbuck Vineyards dot com. Enjoy responsible golden eyed lightning rod. In the nineteen twenties, as flappers and jazz and hollywod would captivate American cities, a man named Bill Kaywood is engaged in a different cultural project at fifty Kwood is a stocky stump of a man with a face like a granite cliff. He’s a professional assassin of wolves, but says he loves the animals he watches die. He’s a real fellow. The big Gray is lots of brains. I feel sorry every time I see one of those big fellows thrashing around in a trap, bellowing bloody murder. Kywood is the sort of American that writer D. H. Lawrence getting his first extended exposure to this country will describe as stoic a killer, and what he is doing is mop up work. Where the continent only three centuries before had easily held one hundred thousand wolf packs. By the nineteen twenties, few packs remain anywhere in the US outside Alaska, the Great Lakes Country and the Lower South Is After the last survivors. In the West, few enough animals that ranchers and government hunters hired on their behalf have started giving the animals individual names they called Two of these last gray wolves, Kywood, is tracking down Rags and Greenhorn, animals that had once lived in packs, once had mates and pups. Rags and Greenhorn are enduring lives of lonely desperation. Like a significant percentage of gray wolves who turn to livestock, they’re too old and frail to bring down elk without.

00:02:35
Speaker 2: A pack’s help.

00:02:37
Speaker 1: Younger wolves who ended up stock killers often had suffered crippling injuries, frequently by losing multiple toes. Are an entire foot escaping the serrated jaws of the new house four and a half steel trap. Rags had seen two of the mates he had had during his lifetime panicked and helpless in a trap. He learned from that and is himself unmaimed. Rags is an old wolf, the rachers say seventeen, but he’s probably closer to ten or eleven, and now either travels alone or with two younger wolves who are far less crafty as for Greenhorn. This female wolf, named for a local mountain near Kywood’s front range home, has teeth so worn she’s been reduced to strangling her prey. In her past, she’s escaped traps and spit out a strychnind bait before it could kill her. When Kwood goes after her in nineteen twenty three, the ranchers claim she’s eighteen years old. Whatever her real age, she is slowly starving to death. These are wolves the federal agency Kwood works for should leave to die natural deaths, but Rags and Greenhorn live in a nation that cannot brook a single wolf remaining alive anywhere. It’s Rags’s turned first. Across weeks of time, Kwood sets his traps and Rags digs them up with a wolf that’s smart. The former bounty hunter rigs a trap set designed to snare a wolf by a back leg as it digs up other traps with its front paws.

00:04:17
Speaker 2: It works with a.

00:04:19
Speaker 1: Trap biting into a rear leg, and a second trap sprung on the dragline of the first, bouncing after him on a three foot chain. The old wolf spends a final day in tortured flight. In the end, hemmed into a box canyon, he confronts a fate he’s escaped for a decade. Purposefully, he limps straight towards Kwood, yellow eyes fixed and staring, as the metal clanks over.

00:04:47
Speaker 2: The rocks behind him.

00:04:49
Speaker 1: Kwood stoically shoots the equivalent of an octogenarian wolf in the head next Greenhorn. It’s December, cold and snowing on the front range, and with her teeth mostly gone, the elderly wolf can’t down a.

00:05:06
Speaker 2: Deer, let alone a cow. She’s desperately hungry.

00:05:10
Speaker 1: She knows the sin of strychnine, but Kaywood has attracted her with a horse’s head wired to a juniper, around which he’s placed chunks of fat suet soaked in poisoned Greenhorn shies away from the smell again and again. She knows, from her own experience and from wolf culture, that this scent means tragic danger. She’s witnessed the thrashing, vomiting endgame more than once, but she’s starving to death. She circles back, picks up a chunk of suet, swallows it, then another, and one more. It’s the Day after Christmas nineteen twenty three. Kaywood believes she’s the last wild wolf born in the state of Colorado. By the early twentieth century, a new institutional player emerged to confront wolves and other predators in the United States. Before nineteen oh five, it seemed that Seehart Miriam’s new Bureau of Biological Survey, created to map the wildlife that was left in post frontier America, was sitting pretty teddy.

00:06:20
Speaker 2: Roosevelt was president, and.

00:06:22
Speaker 1: The Bureau was dear to his heart, but Congress was growing testing about funding an agency interested in pure science. At Livestock Association meetings, Western ranchers were arguing that the vast western public lands Roosevelt had set aside from homesteading, were refuges for predators that attacked their stock. Since the FED had created this situation, the ranchers believed the FED ought to fix it, so in an act of self preservation, the Bureau of Biological Survey remade itself into the solution to the country so called predator problem. The claiming that America suffered from these are the Bureau’s words, wolf infested National forests and the federal public domain. The Biological Survey engineered its own public support. Between nineteen oh seven and nineteen oh nine, it issued four reports on the so called predator big game livestock relationship in and around the new National Forests. A young, slightly educated Minnesotan named Vernon Bailey, who was a whiz at trapping animals, authored most of them. An agency like the Bureau, his reports claimed, could bring orderly and scientific control to wolf destruction by hiring train hunters and trappers men like Bill Kywood. Bailey held seminars for National Forest managers, teaching them how to find wolf dens and the best strategies for destroying pups and packs. Forest Service rangers proceeded to kill eighteen hundred wolves and twenty three thousand coyotes in the National Forest within a year. Teddy Roosevelt would hereafter refer to Bailey by a favorite nickname, Wolf Bailey. In twentieth century America, there was literally no opposition to this campaign of annihilation America’s beloved nature writer John Burrows opined that predators certainly needed killing, since the.

00:08:29
Speaker 2: Fewer of these there are, the better for.

00:08:32
Speaker 1: The useful and beautiful game. As he wrote. Wildlife activist William Hornday insisted that firearms, dogs, traps, and Strycht nine are thoroughly legitimate weapons of destruction. No halfway measures suffice. Not even John Muir spoke out. Although Muir did worry that slaughtering wolves might induce what he called a penalty for interfering with the balance of nature, there was another constituency for the war on predators, too. Destroying wolves would produce all the deer and elk America’s new sport hunters could ever want. No one asked whether sport hunters would focus on the same animals in an elk herd that wolves did, because no one knew anything about wolf prey relationships then. But advocating replacing predators with human hunters was a stroke of genius, bringing all manner of sportsmen’s groups, firearms manufacturers, and state game and fish agencies to the cause of wiping out every wolf on the continent. So without conducting a single research project on the wolf’s role, in nature. The Biological Survey engineered massive public support for wolf extermination, and in nineteen fourteen, Congress approved and appropriation of one hundred and twenty five thousand.

00:09:58
Speaker 2: Dollars for the Bureau to launch the war.

00:10:01
Speaker 1: Within two years, the Bureau had three hundred federal hunters in the field. Under Miriam’s leadership, the Biological Survey was now a critical federal agency on behalf of a civilized America made in the image of European countries that had long ago destroyed their own predators. The one field of twentieth century wildlife science in which Americans became acknowledged global leaders was in fact the destruction of so called undesirable species. If your assignment was to mass kill wolves, the way to go was poisoning entire populations, and you did that by strewing poisoned baits by the thousands across the American landscape. As for the target animal, the campaign brooked no mercy or compassion. At one point, Vernon Bailey inquired of his boss about the proper dose of Strycht nine, so a poisoned wolf might die within a humane three minutes, knowing full well that any expression of mercy towards wolves was a political liability, Miriam shot back, You had better go at once to the hospital in Albuquerque. Inasmuch as no sane man could possibly make such an absurd and utterly preposterous statement as this, You are obviously in need of mental treatment, Miriam went on, We want the cattleman behind us.

00:11:34
Speaker 2: SABE.

00:11:37
Speaker 1: With its new funding, the Bureau was building a plant in Albuquerque to produce strict nine baits in volume. Chillingly, they called it the Eradication Methods Lab. By nineteen twenty one, this federal killing facility had moved to Denver, in which location it eventually perfected an amazing witches bred of ever deadlier pretocides. But for the next two decades, federal poisoners relied on strychnine. It was potent twisting wolves into a stryct nine signature. Their bodies wrenched and their tails shot straight out, as if they’d been struck by a bolt of lightning. Federal hunters quickly grasped the wolf’s fatal flaw. The smaller American canids coyotes, had evolved an adaptation called fish and fusion, living in social groups when possible. Fusion but capable of scattering when ecological pressures called for it fishing, but wolves are so strongly family based that wolf killers realize that killing one animal and using it sent on your baits meant, as one bureau hunter put it, you could quickly kill all the members of whole families of wolves, with unmistakable evidence that the remaining members of the wolf family have been seeking the lost member. Neuroscience studies at this very moment are verifying the brain chemistry grief that while canids suffer from the loss of their mates, at this fikun moment, two new developments were about to alter the art of the country’s wolf story though. In nineteen fifteen, scientific naturalists founded the Ecological Society of America, and at their first meeting in Philadelphia, the founding members, Frederick Clements and Edith Clements, Charles c Adams, and Victor Shelford, agreed on a focus for their new discipline. There was adaptation and natural selection, of course, along with investigating the flow of energy through nature and an analysis of serial stages and climax conditions. Shelford, who had just published his landmark Animal Communities in Temperate America, pushed his colleagues to work on biotic communities as well. In nineteen fifteen, the society counted three hundred and seven members. But it was an old fashioned topic, an idea Western culture had known since the time of Herodotus and Plato as the balance of nature that pushed ecology towards rethinking the role of predators. The biological surveys policies had assumed the European folk position predators were evil and disposable. Their eradication made for a civilized nation. The ecologists believed there might instead be dynamic equilibria at work in the natural world. That assumption would become the crux of a raging battle in American and Western science for the next half century. The other development of the moment was America’s creation of a National Park Service in nineteen sixteen. Initially, Yellowstone, the world’s first national park, had emerged as a symbol of just how far the wolf warriors intended to go. In nineteen fourteen, Yellowstone had invited Vernon Bailey to come and show its personnel the best techniques to exterminate wolves. Yellowstone’s tally till the death of the last gray wolf in the park that happened in the year nineteen twenty six was one hundred and thirty six wolves, eighty of which were puppies. Between nineteen eighteen and nineteen thirty five, the world’s first Great Wildlife part issued a death sentence to two thousand, nine hundred and sixty eight coyotes. All the while the Eradication Methods Lab was cranking out the strychnine until by the mid nineteen twenties, Bureau hunters had distributed an astounding three million, five hundred sixty seven thousand poison baits across the country. Yet, amid the endgame in America, evidence of Darwinian natural selection and an emergent wolf culture of survivability was emerging. Stanley Young, a hunter who had rise through the ranks at the Bureau, believed that these last animals that it is probable that never did more intelligent wolves exist. Like eighteenth century sperm whales that famously figured out how to avoid whaling boats and harpooners, wolves like Rags and Greenhorn, drew on the accumulated cultural learning of scores of wolf generations and taught their pups about rifles, traps, and poisons. No wonder the last ones were so smart. Ratchers and federal hunters named many of the last wolves in the West. Along with Rags and Greenhorn in Colorado, there was also Old Lefty, Old Old Whitey, Bigfoot, Phantom Wolf, and Oodahweep. In Oregon, there was a last wolf called Sycan, a King Lobo in New Mexico Snowdrift, and the prior Creek Wolf in Montana, Aguila in Arizona, and the Custer Wolf in South Dakotas. Three toes or clubfoot were common wolf names, referencing all the animals crippled by traps. There were red wolf renegades too, including Traveler in Arkansas, Black Devil in Oklahoma, and Crip in Texas, another maimed animal. Given the accounts federal hunters left of their protracted efforts to kill these wolves, there’s little doubt these were indeed remarkably intelligent animals, and why not, as they were experiencing on all sides. Humans were engaged in a crusade to wipe out their kind entirely. But as the in nineteen twenties dawned, what seemed initially to be a natural ally mounted the first real challenge to the Bureau’s scorched earth Wolf War. The American Society of Mammalogists met for the first time at the Smithsonian in nineteen nineteen. Bureau founder Seehart Miriam became its first president with Vernon Bailey, and Bureau made E. A. Goldman as charter members. Like Bailey, Goldman had field experience, but he lacked a college degree. Nonetheless, the Bureau tasked these two men to explain and defend the wolf War against university trained ecologists. Among that group was a young forester interested in wildlife, Aldo Leopold. There was also Joseph Grinnell, a cousin of the legendary conservation hero George Bird Grennell. Grennell was an original thinker whose ideas quick challenged the very premises on which the Bureau based its predator War. The first blow up happened at the mammalogists nineteen twenty four meeting. Grennell had just published a foundational piece on ecological niches, a fundamental insight into nature critical to appreciating what might happen if America.

00:19:21
Speaker 2: Destroyed its wolf population.

00:19:24
Speaker 1: Grennell and his graduate student E. Raymond Hall insisted from this work on niches that the Bureau was wiping out animals that were playing an essential role in the continence balance of nature. As it turned out, both the ecologists and the bureau men were unaware that the natural world in America was about to offer powerful examples of the implications of emptying predator niches. But Goldman and Bailey decide they had heard about the balance of nature a few times too many. If the US actually let predators live, they argued, there would soon be nothing but carnivores left. In a throwdown essay, The Predatory Mammal Problem and the Balance of Nature that he authored for the Journal of Mammalogy, Goldman insisted that the coming of civilized man meant that the balance of nature has been violently overturned, never to be re established. Thus, large predatory mammals, destructive to livestock and to game, no longer have a place in our advancing civilization. But Joseph Grenell had come up with another idea, and this one vexed the Bureau as much as niches and the balance of nature. Now there was a National Park Service with an Organic Act directive charging it with preserving nature for future generations.

00:20:55
Speaker 2: But how to do that and in what form?

00:21:00
Speaker 1: And zoologist Tracy storer had a suggestion they laid out in an article for the journal Science. In their opinion, preserving nature meant predaceous animals should be left unmolested and allowed to retain their primitive relation to the rest of the fauna, as tourists.

00:21:19
Speaker 2: Were already showing.

00:21:20
Speaker 1: They wrote, wolves, coyotes, and lions were exceedingly interesting to part visitors. Wasn’t a complete nature? What preserving nature in the parks intended offering predators permanent refuge in America’s national parks? Dumbfounded Bureau personnel. New Bureau Director Paul Reddington was incredulous we faced the opposition. He told his employees of those who want to see the mountain lion, the wolf, the coyote, and the bobcat actually perpetuated as part of the wildlife of the country. One of the scientists keenly interested in this debate had published an essay he called the Varmit Question, heaping praise on the Bureau when he was just out of Yale. So Aldo Leopold was not a vocal critic of the Bureau as the wolf debate Royal Science, but as conference chairman of the American Game Protection Association’s meeting in nineteen twenty eight. Leopold’s position about predators was obviously evolving. No public agencies should ever control predators without substantial scientific research. First, he wrote for the association, poisons should only be used in emergencies and no predatory species should be exterminated.

00:22:57
Speaker 2: Over large areas.

00:23:00
Speaker 1: Now, as professor of game management at the University of Wisconsin, Leopold dropped more deeply into ecology the field worried critics were already calling the subversive science. One of the issues he particularly studied was the response of nature to predator removal. The nineteen twenties witnessed the rise of a new meme to describe a new natural phenomenon. The meme word was eruption, and it referred to a sudden ungulate population explosion that caused herds to eat themselves out of forage and then crash. Spectacularly, the cause effect seemed straightforward. The famous Kaibab eruption on the north rim of the Grand Canyon was preceded by bureau hunters erasing thirty wolves, seven hundred and eighty one mountain lions, and five thousand coyotes from the north rim. The resident mule deer then exploded from four thousand animals to one hundred thousand, leading to a catastrophic die off. It made Kaibab a national story. Eruptions became a moral that wouldn’t go away. With wolves vanishing, deer and ilk experienced crazy population oscillations somewhere in the country almost every year. Something in nature obviously was a miss. Leopold would go on to do a study of eruptions, finding reports of only two of them before nineteen hundred, but a whopping forty two between nineteen hundred and nineteen forty five, the number rising sharply after nineteen twenty. Eruptions seemed to supply evidence for the so called Latka Volterra equations, ecological models of how prey and their predators follow an oscillating algorithm of rising and falling populations in harmony with one another. But the inertia of the wolf war was now an unstoppable undertow in America. The Bureau’s move was to go to the American public with a series of canned articles attend to those lauding the g men, hunting crime celebrities like Al Capone and John Dillinger, US agents stock desperadoes of the animal world.

00:25:32
Speaker 2: The headlines of those stories read.

00:25:37
Speaker 1: There still had been no science to study the larger role of wolves and predators in American nature, but by the nineteen forties that was finally about to change. The two Minnesota brothers O Loss and Adolph Murray were soon to become legendary figures in American conservation. Having done landmark studies on la in Jackson Hole and on the porcupine cariboo heard in Alaska, O Loss would conduct a game changing study of coyotes and Jackson Hole, which appeared in print in nineteen thirty five. Brother Adolph Mury’s own ecology of the Coyote and the Yellowstone Saw print in nineteen forty. Both works concluded that far from being arch predators that deserved extermination, coyotes produced actions in the world that were virtually all either beneficial to humans or neutral. The Muri brothers would become famous as ethical researchers who followed their evidence. Unfortunately for the Bureau now renamed the US Fish and Wildlife Service, the Muri brothers work did not lead to the conclusions it hoped for wolves either. By nineteen forty, Mount McKinley in Alaska was the only American park that still had wolves. For centuries of unexamined wolf killing, perhaps it was time to figure out something about wolf ecology. So in nineteen thirty nine Muri went to Alaska and spent three years engaged in the unthinkable, actually studying wolves interacting among themselves and.

00:27:19
Speaker 2: With their prey.

00:27:21
Speaker 1: It was arduous, Murray said, he walked seventeen hundred miles the first year, but everyone who reads his classic The Wolves of Mount McKinley can’t help but thrill to his excitement at studying the mythic animal Americans had reflexively tried to exterminate. After three years in Alaska, Muriy understood what the Bureau had been too arrogant or myopic to see. Wolf prey relationships clearly were ancient, predating Europeans by thousands or maybe millions of years. Natural selection had long sorted out the details. Yes, wolves and coyotes ate prong horned fawns, so prong horns had evolved a solution. They gave birth to twins, an air and a spare.

00:28:12
Speaker 2: Yes.

00:28:13
Speaker 1: Wolves preyed on doll sheep and cariboo, but they caught the very young and the very old. Wolves held sheep numbers in check and kept them from overgrazing their mountains, rather than destroying their prey. Wolf predation probably has a salutary effect on the sheep as a species. Muir wrote, wolves did kill Caribou calves, but as Muir studied the relationship, he realized that Cariboo herds are no doubt adjusted to the presence and pressure.

00:28:45
Speaker 2: Of the wolf.

00:28:46
Speaker 1: These things were ancient. They predated all humans in America. Muriy did one other thing readers of his book never forgot. He brought the wolves he studied to life as individuals. Dandy, Robber, Mask, and Grandpa had unique personalities. Pact members seemed affectionate and caring of one another. These were not the wolves old worlders feared from the animals they had brought ashore. They weren’t the wolves the bureau’s public relations articles implied were animal gangsters. They were the wolves that had been in North America all along. The Wolves of Mount McKinley was the country’s first entree into a modern sensibility about wolves and predators built on science generally, and once the blindfold was off, it was hard for the scientifically literate, ever to put it on again. At almost the same time Yuri’s book came out, Old Bureau veterans Stanley Young and E. A. Goldman finally published their two volume The Wolves of North America, a book that has manned the wolf section of every American library for almost a century now. They proudly pointed out that by the nineteen forties, from New England to Virginia, wolves were now entirely gone. The Rocky Mountain States, with all their public lands, barely held.

00:30:19
Speaker 2: One hundred wolves.

00:30:20
Speaker 1: California’s last wolves are down to fewer than fifty. There were only sixty Mexican wolves left in the Southwest.

00:30:28
Speaker 2: As World War two ended.

00:30:29
Speaker 1: The only places in the lower forty eighth that still had sizable populations were the Upper Great Lakes Country with fourteen hundred wolves and the mid South with some four hundred and fifty red wolves. Young and Goldman were unrepentant wolf assassins. They laid out their book like it was a military campaign against Germany or Japan, full of accounts of wolf depredations, photos of wolfkilt. Stock claims that game was disappear because of wolves. They events dismayed that stock raising Hispanic settlers in the Southwest in California had never attempted predator control, since the authors claimed wolves had slowed Anglo American settlement of the continent by decades. The one atrocity they couldn’t level against America’s wolves were attacks on humans. Not that they didn’t look hard for some example, but they simply couldn’t find one. In a case of future meat. Past Aldo Leopold reviewed The Wolves of North America in nineteen forty five. How could it be, he wondered, that Young and Goldman didn’t acknowledge the deep history of their subject. If wolves were as destructive of force as they implied in their book, how had the continent’s wolves failed to wipe out its own mammalian food supply before Europeans ever arrived last Leopold had visited Europe and studied its wildlife policies, so he knew the bureau men never questioned the Old World model. But European countries had nothing comparable to the vast wild public lands Americans had set aside, and their model was based on folk tradition established long before ecology was born that simply was not as Leopold said scientific the new Wolf book reflected the naturalists of the past rather than the wildlife ecologists of today. Leopold wrote ouch. In nineteen forty nine, America’s star biologists finally published the book of his that would set the country on its modern path.

00:32:50
Speaker 2: Of wolf recovery and restoration.

00:32:53
Speaker 1: Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac became both a bestseller and a philosophical foundation for the ecology movement sweeping America as part of the sixties cultural revolution. Where damn lucky he got it out. He died of a heart attack battling a grass fire that very year. Because A Sand County Almanac changed the world In vivid, poetic passages, Leopold’s book introduced us to the insights of a mind that attract every breakthrough in ecology. By then, he had concluded that the old balance of nature idea actually lacked the flexibility to account for a natural world that was endlessly changing. He was now thinking of natural settings as interlink communities of species.

00:33:40
Speaker 2: With predators at the top.

00:33:42
Speaker 1: We know those communities today as ecosystems. Leopold’s ideas were epiphanies for many For one, he laid out an ecological philosophy for living he called the land ethic that included his Golden rule of ecology. A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise. The genius that built the United States had always been self interest. Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill had hit on a trade fundamental to our evolution, But Leopold did not say an act was right when it preserved humanity or economics. Instead, he called on readers to think of the innate rights, among them the simple right to exist of other species in an earthly community that included us. Leopold’s admirers called his new idea biocentrism. A San County Almanac’s most unforgettable scene was Leopold’s own myth of personal redemption. The chapter titled Thinking Like a Mountain was not merely a poetic rendering of his view that the United States had an opportunity to create a distinctively American policy towards nature for readers soon to be immersed in painful soul searching about so many unexamined assumptions in American life. Leopold’s story of shooting a wolf, watching the green fire die in its eyes, and realizing what a miscalculation he had made about the ancient centrality of predators in the biotic community, offered America a whole new trajectory.

00:35:39
Speaker 2: We were wrong, I was wrong, history said, but it’s not too late.

00:35:46
Speaker 1: Ever since a Sand County Almanac fell into the hands of readers, there has been a quiet murmur of disbelief from some about whether its most stirring scene really happened. Did Leopold actually shoot a wolf and experience an ecological epiphany as he watched it die? Some fifteen years ago, a group of committed fans that included respected Leopold biographer Susan Flater determined that indeed the wolf story was factual. In nineteen oh nine, early in his career as a forester in the Southwest, Leopold was surveying the boundaries of the Apache National Forest along Arizona’s Black River today right in the heart of the recovery area for endangered Mexican wolves. From a casual mention of the incident in a letter to his mother, it seems that one morning he and a companion shot a pair of animals Leopold called timberwolves.

00:36:49
Speaker 2: So that part of his story at least now stands confirmed as historical fact.

00:36:56
Speaker 1: Whether Leopold’s troubled reaction to watching a wolf die and grasping the implications happened in nineteen oh nine or far later in his life is the part that we can’t know.

00:37:09
Speaker 2: But maybe it doesn’t matter.

00:37:11
Speaker 1: We do know that Aldo Leopold didn’t get to see his America began to think like a mountain in his.

00:37:19
Speaker 2: Memorable phrase, but he had pointed us.

00:37:21
Speaker 1: Towards a new understanding and a new destination in our history, and in that destination the wolf will return to its ancient, rightful place.

00:37:32
Speaker 3: On the comment, So, Dan, in this.

00:37:45
Speaker 4: This episode about wolves, you make the point that ecology, you can think of it as a subversive science and sort of all the broader implications about thinking thing of the natural orial in terms of connections and dependency and all that stuff. I wonder if you can kind of just begin by explaining ecology and what it meant to people at the moment that it sort of had this almost like ground shaking effect.

00:38:17
Speaker 1: Yeah, The Ecological Society of America dates in nineteen fifteen and it. Ecology obviously comes out of the Darwinian Revolution. In fact, within about three or four years of the publication of On the Origin of Species in eighteen fifty nine, a German scientist was calling for a new science that applied the insights of Darwin’s on the Origin of Species, and he called it. He used a Greek term that refers in fact to communities, and he called it ecology. The United States, as I said, we don’t get an ecological society of ecologists until nineteen fifteen, although there are already in that first Meetia three hundred and seven of them. So they are already three hundred practicing ecologists in the United States by that time. And the reason this is important in this discussion of wolves, and this is the story of wolves. I mean, I talked a few episodes ago about wolves in the West in the nineteenth century, and this is the story essentially of how we came to understand the role of wolves in American ecological life. And so if you’re trying to figure out, for an instance, why there is in the modern West this movement to restore wolves to Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Arizona, New Mexico, now Colorado, obviously, and California has wolves now, and so do the Pacific Northwest States. The reason this has become a thing in our time is because of these developments in science that I try to describe in this particular episode. This is how and why it happens that in our time we’re making the attempt to recover wolves. The problem, of course, was that during the time when science is discovering the ancient and extremely important role wolves have always played in North American history, we are still employing the old folk tradition out of the old world, which had been telling us for hundreds of years, you’re supposed to kill every predator that exists. Predators are evil, predators may even be satanic. This is what Adam and Eve confront when they had to leave the Garden of Eden. They had to confront predators. So we need to cleanse the world of predators. And this kind of thinking was imported to the United States, obviously, without any kind of scientific background whatsoever. And so we’re still as a country and a government agency that I talk about here, the Bureau of Biological Survey, is committed to it. On behalf of particularly the livestock industry, we’re still trying to wipe out every wolf that roams across North America. And this is happening at the same time that the science of ecology, the subversive science, is beginning to describe for us the role that these animals have been playing in North American history for time immemorial. And so that puts at odds these two really powerful forces science on the one hand and this old folk tradition on the other, and they battle it out for most of the first half of the twentieth century about what’s going to happen to wolves. And I will say that for the most part, for the early part of this story, it’s the old folk tradition of killing every wolf you can kill that prevails. But by the end of the period that this script goes to, basically by nineteen fifty, we have begun to realize that this is probably a mistake. We’ve made a mistake with this because we haven’t known enough about how the world has worked.

00:42:34
Speaker 4: Yeah, and you tell the story of wolves in the twentieth century. One that we just sort of touched on is the history of science and changes in scientific thought. But then there’s another lens that’s the history of the growing bureaucratic state or administrative state, and thinking about institutions and institutional missions and the frogatives for getting funding and all these sorts of things like that very much shapes the reality on the ground in the West in terms of what animals live in places like Montana. And so you mentioned earlier in this agency, the Bureau of Biological Survey, and I wonder if you can just sort of drill down on what it is that the Bureau of Biological Survey is up to when it takes on this mission.

00:43:23
Speaker 2: Yeah.

00:43:24
Speaker 1: In my book Well in the World, I spent some time talking about the origins of this particular agency and what it really is is a government agency founded in the eighteen nineties to try to take stock of what wildlife is left in America after the destruction of the frontier period, and is founded by an ivy leaguer a Yale named sa Hart Miriam, and he early on has the idea that what he’s going to do is to send people out his personal appointees, to sort of do surveys about what is left. And so it’s kind of a pure science approach that by the early twentieth century is resulting in the biological survey not being able to make a good case to Congress for appropriating money for them, because Congress is sort of reluctant to appropriate money for an agency that’s just doing pure science.

00:44:32
Speaker 2: And so what.

00:44:35
Speaker 1: Miriam understands by about nineteen five and he immediately moves in the direction of this. Once he gets a good grasp of how he’s going to have to act to make his agency survive, he realizes he’s got to find a mission that Congress will appropriate money for. And since the public lands have left many people in the livestock associations in the West convinced that one of the things that public lands are doing is to providing a kind of breeding They’re providing a breeding ground for predators, for bears and mountain lions and wolves and coyotes. The livestock associations, which have been using bounties for a long time to try to control these animals, turn to the government and say, you guys should do something about this thing that you’ve screwed up. And Miriam realizes, Okay, this is our new mission. We need to make ourselves the solution to the predator problem. And that’s basically what he does, and at that point Congress begins to appropriate an enormous amount of money, I mean, to the point where, by the early nineteen thirties they give the Biological Survey ten million dollars to try to wipe out predators.

00:45:54
Speaker 2: And so this agency.

00:45:56
Speaker 1: That started as a kind of little pure science agency to try to figure out what was left at the end of the frontier, has now become a major federal bureau designed to eliminate as many predators in America as they can.

00:46:11
Speaker 4: And once an agency hitches its wagon to an interest group like that, with a mission like that, it’s very hard to reconsider their actions in light of new science.

00:46:23
Speaker 2: It is very hard.

00:46:24
Speaker 1: And so that’s where this big conflict emerges, because as the ecologists began to discuss this war on predators, that the Biological Survey is mounting I mean, and they’re carrying it out at every level. Vernon Bailey, who is Wolf Bailey, as Teddy Roosevelt calls him, who’s the expert on how to kill wolves, how to find their dans, how to kill puppies, I mean, even goes to Yellowstone and Glacier and teaches the managers there, here’s how you.

00:46:55
Speaker 2: Get rid of your wolves.

00:46:56
Speaker 1: So that that’s why in the nineteen twenties we basically eradicate all the wolves in Yellowstone National Park, all the wolves that are in Glacier, I mean, one place after another we are figuring out, and of course the way they’re doing it primarily is poisoning them with strychnine, because these wolf killers have realized that the way to get rid of mass numbers of wolves is to poison them, because wolves in particular have an Achilles heel, and it’s their emotional attachment to their families, their pups, and their mates. I mean, one of the things I mentioned in this particular script is as I did earlier, is that we’ve got right now in the recent nineteen twenty five or twenty twenty five neuroscience meeting, studies being done on the chemical expressions of grief in wild canids from losing their mates. And that’s what these hunters realize, just by experience in the teens and twenties. If you can kill one animal out of a wolf pack and then bait your sets, your poison sets with the sin of that animal, you can kill every single animal in the pack, one after the other. And that’s why wolves turn out to be relatively easy to get rid of with poison. It’s because of their particular binding affection to their mates and to their pubs. So, I mean, by the middle nineteen twenties, the Bureau Biological Survey has put out three and a half million poison baits across mostly the West, but other parts of the country too, with the goal of wiping wolves completely out.

00:48:48
Speaker 4: And when you’re describing this conflict, there’s sort of one individual who embodies it, you know, personally, and that’s Aldo Leopold, right, who I think is underappreciated as a as a thinker about the natural environment, right, And I mean he’s really sort of an intellect. He has profound intellectual influence on how we view the natural world today. But you know, he starts out as a guy in public service and he’s a boots on the ground, you know, public land manager, and he’s an ecologist, and he undergoes this sort of.

00:49:32
Speaker 2: Conversion. Yeah, as it were.

00:49:35
Speaker 4: That that I think is like it’s easy to understand the bigger story when you sort of look at it through Louipold’s eyes.

00:49:42
Speaker 1: Yeah, that’s that’s a good way to look at Elder Leopold, because Aldo Leopold in his lifetime goes from expressing the sort of folk sentiment of the more wolves, the more predators you killed, the better it is for game, for livestock herders to becoming the person who, by the middle of the twentieth century sets up what happens in the last half of the century, where after the Endangered Species Act has passed, we not only proclaim various species of wolves to be endangered, but under the recovery provisions of that act, we start recovering them. So as Aldo Leopold, that’s a good way of thinking of him. He starts, I mean, he writes an article when he’s a young man called the Varmit Question, where he praises the Bureau of Biological Survey and their wolf war. But by the nineteen teens and twenties you can begin to track the changes in his attitudes. He becomes a professor of ecology at the University of Wisconsin, a very famous public intellectual. Even by the nineteen thirties, but you can see that his opinions are changing, and one of the things that changes them is that he does this study of these ungulate eruptions that are taking place in early twentieth century America. And I mean I talked about this in the script, so I’ll just be brief about it. But what was happening was that as predators are being removed across the American landscape, we were starting to get and this happened all over the country. I mean, it didn’t happen just in the West. It happened in places like Pennsylvania, South Carolina. You were getting these huge eruptions, the huge growth in populations of mule, deer, whitetailed deer, elk, moose, and then they would outstrip their food supply and there would be this tremendous population crash where thousands of animals would die in the winters for lack of food. They had browsed the brows line too high to be able to reach. And Leopold decided he was going to do a historical study of this. So you want to know how many of these eruptions had happened in the nineteenth century. He was able to find two, but he found forty five of them that it happened after nineteen hundred, when we began to have success in removing predators, and so it made him, it gave him an understanding of what the relationship was between predators and their prey. And then he goes the full distance, of course, and sort of not only coming to realize how important wolves are in America, to encouraging us to begin to restore them.

00:52:46
Speaker 4: Well, Dan, I’m sure there’s more to say about wolves, probably more than can be said, but we’ll leave it there.

00:52:53
Speaker 1: There’ll be more wolves to come, at least one more reapon. Indeed, U