Close Menu
Firearms Forever
  • Home
  • Hunting
  • Guns
  • Defense
  • Videos
Trending Now

Sunday Shoot-a-Round # 325

March 24, 2026

Zach Lahn – Exposing the Monsanto Files | SRS #290

March 24, 2026

Cimarron Schofield 5-inch Close-up

March 24, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Firearms Forever
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • Hunting
  • Guns
  • Defense
  • Videos
Firearms Forever
Home»Defense»DC sues Trump over ‘military occupation’ by National Guardsmen
Defense

DC sues Trump over ‘military occupation’ by National Guardsmen

Tim HuntBy Tim HuntSeptember 4, 20252 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
DC sues Trump over ‘military occupation’ by National Guardsmen

The District of Columbia’s attorney general sued the Trump administration Thursday over the ongoing presence of National Guard troops in the nation’s capital, arguing the deployment amounts to a military occupation that violates the district’s right to self-rule.

President Donald Trump’s deployment of D.C. National Guard troops and units from states outside the district  violates laws against using the military for domestic law enforcement and a 1973 federal law allowing the district to govern itself, D.C. Attorney General Brian L. Schwalb wrote in a complaint in federal court in the district.

“No American jurisdiction should be involuntarily subjected to military occupation,” the complaint says, adding that Trump’s “command and control of out-of-state National Guard units when they are in state militia status violates the Constitution and federal law.”

The administration’s actions, which Trump has characterized as an attempt to control crime in the city, “flout the Posse Comitatus Act,” a 19th-century law, and other sections of federal law that “enshrine the nation’s foundational prohibition on the participation of military forces in domestic law enforcement absent the most extreme exigencies, such as an invasion or rebellion,” the complaint said.

“Defendants have established a massive, seemingly indefinite law enforcement operation in the District subject to direct military command. The danger that such an operation poses to individual liberty and democratic rule is self-evident,” the complaint said.

Despite a Tuesday morning ruling from a federal judge in California that called Trump’s use of military personnel for law enforcement in Los Angeles illegal, the president has continued to explore further use of Guard units for what he said is crime prevention in other U.S. cities. 

States with a military presence in the district cited in the suit are Louisiana, South Dakota, Ohio, West Virginia, Tennessee, Mississippi and South Carolina.

This is a developing report that will be updated.

This story was originally published by Stateline.



Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Reddit Email
Previous ArticleFirst Look: Davidson’s Exclusive Huxwrx Suppressors
Next Article Is Wolf Hunting Effective? It Depends on the Context

Related Posts

Sunday Shoot-a-Round # 325

March 24, 2026

Cimarron Schofield 5-inch Close-up

March 24, 2026

Iran war shows the strategic limits of tactical strikes

March 24, 2026

Trump claims ‘good and productive’ talks with Iran, which denies negotiating

March 24, 2026

Mullin takes DHS helm as 100,000 employees remain unpaid

March 24, 2026

KC-135 crash in Iraq spurs calls for communications upgrades

March 23, 2026
Don't Miss

Zach Lahn – Exposing the Monsanto Files | SRS #290

By Shawn Ryan ShowMarch 24, 2026

Watch full video on YouTube

Cimarron Schofield 5-inch Close-up

March 24, 2026

They Found Al Capone’s Hidden Pistol… We Tested It

March 24, 2026

Iran war shows the strategic limits of tactical strikes

March 24, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest firearms news and updates directly to your inbox.

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2026 Firearms Forever. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.