Close Menu
Firearms Forever
  • Home
  • Hunting
  • Guns
  • Defense
  • Videos
Trending Now

Iran TARGETS Israel’s SECRET Nuke Program – U.S. Site HIT HARD

March 24, 2026

Trump MOBILIZES Troops For Invasion – Iran Suffers Missile DISASTER

March 24, 2026

Ep. 1019: Foundations – How Feathered and Furry Narcs Kill Our Whitetail Plans

March 24, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Firearms Forever
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • Hunting
  • Guns
  • Defense
  • Videos
Firearms Forever
Home»Defense»Court Clears Trump to Deploy Oregon Guard in ICE Facility Unrest
Defense

Court Clears Trump to Deploy Oregon Guard in ICE Facility Unrest

Tim HuntBy Tim HuntOctober 22, 20253 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Court Clears Trump to Deploy Oregon Guard in ICE Facility Unrest

A federal appeals court on Monday cleared President Donald Trump to for now send Oregon National Guard troops to Portland, lifting a previous lower court ruling that barred him from doing so following that blocked the move after months of violence outside a federal immigration building.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Trump likely acted within his authority when he ordered 200 Guard members into federal service for 60 days to protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) workers and property at the Lindquist Federal Building.

The Department of Justice appealed a previous order and received a 2-1 ruling in their favor from a panel from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.  Judges said the president made a reasonable judgment based on the facts and the law.

U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, earlier this month issued two temporary restraining orders. One prohibited Trump from calling up, sending troops to Portland; another prohibited him from sending any National Guard members to Oregon at all after Trump attempted to deploy California troops across state lines, according to the Associated Press.

Judges said Trump had good reason to believe federal officers could not keep order on their own. They noted that local police refused to assist and that federal officers were stretched thin.

The court said blocking the president’s order would harm the government’s ability to protect its employees and enforce the law. 

Violence Outside ICE Building

What began as small protests in June grew into nights of chaos.

Protesters set fires, threw fireworks, and hurled rocks at federal officers. One officer was hurt when a mortar exploded nearby. Others were followed home and photographed.

A demonstrator blows bubbles during a protest outside a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility on Saturday, Oct. 11, 2025, in Portland, Ore. (AP Photo/Jenny Kane)

The building was boarded up for weeks after demonstrators tried to break through the front doors. At one point, protesters built a guillotine outside. Local police refused to respond to immigration calls, saying they would only handle life-threatening emergencies.

The Department of Homeland Security asked the Pentagon for help after what it called coordinated attacks by violent groups. Trump used a federal law, 10 U.S.C. 12406, that allows the president to call up the National Guard when regular forces cannot enforce federal law.

When Oregon’s governor rejected the notion, Trump went ahead and ordered the Guard to federal duty. The state and city of Portland sued, saying he overstepped his authority and violated states’ rights.

Next Round of the Fight

The ruling lets Oregon Guard troops deploy while the case moves forward. The state’s lawsuit continues, but the decision gives the president the advantage for now.

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, a Democrat, said he would ask for a broader panel of the appeals to reconsider the decision.

“Today’s ruling, if allowed to stand, would give the president unilateral power to put Oregon soldiers on our streets with almost no justification,” Rayfield said, according to the AP. “We are on a dangerous path in America.”

Similar court fights are underway in California and Illinois. Legal experts say the battle over who controls the Guard could reach the Supreme Court.

Story Continues

Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Reddit Email
Previous ArticleLockheed basks in F-35 delivery win
Next Article Shield AI’s unmanned fighter jet concept pitched as a drone wingman or solo aircraft

Related Posts

Can We All Agree On Something?

March 24, 2026

Sunday Shoot-a-Round # 325

March 24, 2026

Cimarron Schofield 5-inch Close-up

March 24, 2026

Iran war shows the strategic limits of tactical strikes

March 24, 2026

Trump claims ‘good and productive’ talks with Iran, which denies negotiating

March 24, 2026

Mullin takes DHS helm as 100,000 employees remain unpaid

March 24, 2026
Don't Miss

Trump MOBILIZES Troops For Invasion – Iran Suffers Missile DISASTER

By David HooksteadMarch 24, 2026

Watch full video on YouTube

Ep. 1019: Foundations – How Feathered and Furry Narcs Kill Our Whitetail Plans

March 24, 2026

If You Don’t Carry Appendix, Are You the Problem?

March 24, 2026

Can We All Agree On Something?

March 24, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest firearms news and updates directly to your inbox.

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2026 Firearms Forever. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.